SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            I figured it out – I figured out what’s wrong with the Obamacare website!

            Not that I can fix it … let’s not get silly.

            I got the idea from Star Trek. Specifically, from some dialogue in the movie Star Trek V: The Final Frontier. This is the one where Kirk and Spock sing campfire songs and fight God. Hm … there could be more government jokes in there, somewhere.

            Anyway, here are the lines that got my attention:

            Captain Kirk: “You told me you could get this ship operational in two weeks, I gave you three, what happened?”
            Engineer Scott: “I think you gave me TOO much time, Captain.”

            See, it’s funny because … never mind. Although it might be the funniest moment of the movie, unless you count the unintentional laughs.           

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            After writing this column about Syria, I realized my 9/11 column was due that week. As a result of that delay, by the time you read this America might have turned Syria into a relief map of Edward James Olmos’ face. More likely, Congress will still be debating how much extra pork-barrel spending they can tack onto a law authorizing an attack on Syria.

            The mistrust fairly oozes from my pores when it comes to Congressional authorizations. Mostly they love to authorize the spending of giant Godzilla fists full of dollars. However, while I’m a well-known hater of Congress and pretty much everything President Obama stands for, let’s try to do something a little different, for a change:

            Let’s look at this objectively.

           

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            Some people felt that after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Americans would finally come together for the common good and work out their differences.

            But most of us knew better.

            I wonder how long it took after the Pearl Harbor attack before people started forgetting its significance, or even complained when others continued to honor the memory of those lost? I’ll bet some people were getting tired of it before World War II was even over, and that took “just” four years, for Americans. Here we are now, twelve years after 9/11 … we’re still at war, but most of us don’t even know it.

            At least there was one plan to remember, by the city most directly affected by the attacks on 9/11. The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation was put in charge of a museum that would commemorate the attacks. Victims wanted something simple, and respectful, and other stuff that never happens when politicians and bureaucrats get involved. Let’s take a look at some things that have gone on with the 9/11 Memorial Museum:

            One of the most iconic photos of 9/11, the raising of the American flag by FDNY firefighters, was almost excluded from the museum. Why? Because it was “too rah-rah American”. According to a book, the museum’s creative director said “The way we can really do best, is to not be Americans so vigilantly and so vehemently”.

            Um … are we not Americans? Besides, isn’t not being vigilant one of the things that got us into trouble in the first place?

            That guy, the museum director, is making a six figure income, but doesn’t seem to understand the whole point of his museum.

            Meanwhile, the politician who should have cared the most is the same guy who wanted to stop the reading of 9/11 victim names on the anniversary.  “Some people have said change is good,” Mayor Bloomberg said of it on the radio.

            I agree, but good change doesn’t always happen – after all, he’s still the mayor.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg, he of the notorious desire to control everything that goes into his city’s residents (and maybe out of them, who knows?) also banned first responders from being able to attend the 10th anniversary of the attacks.

 

Tags:

 

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

 

            The other day I was telling someone the issue of gay marriage had become too politicized, which is true. However, all issues have become too politicized, including politics.

 

            I used to be against gay marriage, for one simple reason: Haven’t gays been punished enough?

 

            I also used to have a little photo of a white-clad bride, with the caption, “Why do I have to get married? I didn’t do anything wrong!”

 

            You gay people out there, you know who you are: What are you thinking? You have a readymade excuse to avoid marriage: It’s illegal! Commitment phobia? No problem: “Oh, sorry, dear – my idea of expanding my dating pool never included meeting everyone in cellblock B.”

 

            But I no longer make such anti-marriage jokes, because … well, because now I’m married.

 

            On the other hand, I’m a humor columnist, and it’s my job to make fun of stuff, and things.

 

            On the third hand, I’ve looked into both sides and I understand their arguments, and their feelings on the issue. Can I make fun of people, even when I find their arguments persuasive and understandable?

 

            Yes.

           

 

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            By the time you read this, the world may have ended. At least, that’s how some are treating the Sequester, which is apparently Latin for Apocalypse.

            The Sequester is an agreement between the President and Congress, by itself amazing enough. It means that, if our government can’t agree on a budget by a certain date, draconian spending cuts kick in and all the oxygen will be sucked out of the country.

            “Draconian” is a Greek word meaning “needed”. There’s not much doubt among anyone with common sense that huge government spending cuts are needed, since Congress’ addiction to red ink spending makes meth addicts look like paragons of self-control.

Okay, so let’s see: Congress hasn’t passed a budget since 2010. In August, 2011, they approved the Budget Control Act, which made automatic spending cuts and tax increases if Congress didn’t act on the budget by January 1st, 2013. At around 2 a.m. on January 1st – technically late – they passed legislation that kicks the problem a few months further down the road, increases taxes, and does absolutely nothing to reduce spending. And they didn’t even take a few minutes to approve disaster relief for people left destitute by Superstorm Sandy.

 

*slow, ironic clapping*  Well done, Congress. Well done.

 

But we can’t just blame them: Despite a 10 percent approval rating, in 2012 we reelected 91% of those crooks and morons.

Tags:

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            I assume, since the Presidential election was so close, that President Obama understands he doesn’t have anything that could be called a mandate for his next four years. What he has, in fact, is a nation more divided than Dolly Parton’s cleavage.

            (And yet, before the election was officially called, an Obama supporter said on network news that the President did, indeed, have a mandate.)

            (Wait, Dolly Parton? Should I use a more modern well-endowed celebrity? Snooki? That fat guy from Pawn Stars? How do I know they’re not both using push-ups?)

            (Why do I use parenthesis so often?)           

Maybe, then, he’ll listen to me, a person who according to internet questionnaires is a right leaning moderate. And those things are never wrong. So I’ve drawn up a list of questions that, I hope, will make the President think about the challenges we face, and how we can solve them using reason and common sense, rather than partisan politics. )
ozma914: (Courthouse)
( Nov. 6th, 2012 08:48 pm)

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            I try to get my weekly column turned in by Friday (and often succeed), but the paper doesn’t actually come out until the Wednesday. That’s a problem during an election, because it means I have to write the thing almost a week before voting results are in. Writing a story about the 2012 election would be a case of predicting the future.

            So I did.

            Actually, as I write this it’s two weeks before the election, but what the heck: I’ll either be right or wrong, and another week won’t change that unless Joe Biden is found in bed with a dead lawyer or a live prostitute. So here’s the way the election’s going to go:           

(Mind you, this was all before FrankenStorm hit the East Coast, which could have a way bigger impact than Biden’s prostitute lawyer. Who doesn’t exist. What I predict to happen by the hour might be by the day, or week.) )

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            Here are two of the main causes of problems with government in this country:

            First, there are those people who say there’s no point voting because it doesn’t make a difference, then complain about the politicians other people vote in.

            Second is the fact that the public’s approval rating of Congress is 10%; yet in the 2012 election, 84% of the Senate incumbents and 85% of House incumbents held onto their seats.

            The first is a product of not only frustration, but laziness. We don’t want to take the time to research the candidates and choose the best one – or the least worst one. We don’t want to support and encourage good candidates, and we don’t want to go through the meat grinder of being candidates ourselves.

            The second is more revealing, and is a variation of the “not in my back yard” argument: “Every member of Congress is worthless and criminal – except my Congressman.”

           

This is where I usually start harassing you, dear reader, in an attempt to get out the vote. If just six more of you had come out last election, I might still be a member of the Town Council and enjoy franking privileges, the town car, the private office and assistant, the Council swimming pool and skeet shooting range … )

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            I didn’t watch the first Presidential debate, or the Vice-Presidential debate, for the same reason why I don’t watch most talk shows: I don’t like people talking past each other without actually considering what the other is saying. It’s like the late stages of a drunken family reunion.

            (In the second Presidential debate, Romney did a credible job against the tag-team of Obama and “moderator” Candy Crowley.)           

After spending four years studying the President’s performance and six months studying his opponent, I’ve pretty much decided. Besides, I follow politics, but not voluntarily. Studying the issues and candidates is simply a civic responsibility, like voting in the election, or for America’s Next Top Chef Shooter Model Idol (coming next season on Fox). )

 

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            This is a good time to make serious inquires and observations relating to American politics, with this very important election coming up. But I don’t work that way. So instead, I decided to interview Vice-President Joe Biden. But he doesn’t work that way, so I put together an interview using his own words.

            There were so many words. As I researched, I saw the difference between Biden and the much-maligned Clint Eastwood speech from the Republican convention. Eastwood’s unscripted talk was rambling and a bit free-associative, and many people didn’t get his old actor’s technique of speaking to an empty chair. (Although how many of the rest of us could have done better without a teleprompter, including most politicians?) But if you parse out his words, you could make sense of it and it was pretty straightforward. (Whether you agree or not.)

            Biden, on the other hand, often comes out sounding all smooth and politician-like, right up until the instant he verbally steps into a big, stinking load of wet caca. All in all, I’d take Eastwood.

           

“I can tell you I’ve known eight Presidents, three of them intimately.” )

 

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

                “Excuse me, President Obama? We have a problem.”

                There will be no problems in this administration, young man; only hope and change.

                “Yessir, but … it seems the Solyndra Company has filed for bankruptcy.”

                What? That’s impossible. They can’t fail – it’s green energy! Green energy is our future, plus it’s really cool. It’s green, darn it!

                “Apparently they couldn’t compete with Chinese manufacturers of more conventional solar modules.”

But didn’t we give them a few million dollars?

                “Um, half a billion. And the state of California gave them twenty-five million, give or take a hundred thousand.”               

Okay, well, just send them some more. What are printing presses for, if you can’t print money with them?  )

 

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            I’m sure most of you wondered why I haven’t commented on politics lately, what with this being a Presidential election year and all. You didn’t? Huh.

            I guess no one cares, which is also the reason why we keep putting the same bozos back into those plush Washington offices.

But to a humor columnist, getting material from the political world is like being handed the keys to the chocolate factory: There’s just so much wonderful stuff there, you don’t know where to start.

            It’s a deadly serious business, but it’s also so pretty ridiculous. It’s said that democracy is the worst possible political system – except for all the others – but it’s the best for writers looking to make fun of something.           

How to proceed? Try to understand why the process is so vital and important, and pass that on to the reader? Or stick with satire and allegedly witty wordplay? As a student of history and politics I want Barrack Obama out of office, badly enough to support this year’s Republican third-stringers as they aim political pistols at their own feet.  )

 

Stitching Together an Obama Opponent:

 http://www.markrhunter.com/2012/05/10/stitching-together-an-obama-opponent/

 “Now Republicans are left with Mitt Romney, a guy whose first name makes everyone think of frostbitten fingers. That’s why I’ve got twenty bucks on Obama being a two term President.”

ozma914: (Astrid and Walter)
( Dec. 29th, 2011 05:50 am)
SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

Whew. Was 2011 an exhausting year, or what? It felt like the whole world spent the last twelve months running a marathon at internet speed. No wonder my feet hurt.
 
It may turn out to be something of a watershed year for me, as I accomplished one of my life’s biggest goals. No, I didn’t get into Bill Gates’ will. No, I didn’t get the word “snow” banished from the dictionary. No, I didn’t win a lifetime supply of chocolate: I got that first novel published.

Just about everything else went wrong for me, which I suppose was karma balancing the scales. I don’t appreciate that, karma. But considering the rest of the world, it’s hard to complain.
 
Let’s take a look at some of the events of 2011. Why? Well, everyone else is doing it.
 
Lots of bad things happened, of course. Osama bin Laden and that guy in Libya who couldn’t figure out how to spell his name were killed. Bad things happened, too.
 
I prefer not to focus on the bad things, or at least not the bad things I can’t make fun of. Iran trying to get nukes? Just not funny. An overspending Federal government heading over a cliff? Not funny. The entire world coming to a standstill so a Prince can get married in England? I could make fun of that all day. )
Here is why S&P downgraded the US credit rating.

• U.S. Tax revenue: $2,170,000,000,000
• Fed budget: $3,820,000,000,000
• New debt: $ 1,650,000,000,000
• National debt: $14,271,000,000,000
• Recent budget cut: $ 38,500,000,000

Now let’s remove 8 zeros and pretend it’s a household budget.

• Annual family income: $21,700
• Money the family spent: $38,200
• New debt on the credit card: $16,500
• Outstanding balance on the credit card: $142,710
• Total budget cuts: $385
Tags:
I don't particularly care what anyone's politics are on the matter of the US federal budget; the numbers speak for themselves. If there's one thing we all should be able to agree on, it's that spending twice what you take in simply isn't sustainable. The only thing I'll say about raising taxes (other than that loopholes must be closed), is that you don't cure a drinking problem by buying more booze.


SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

I was thinking about writing a funny column on the budget debate in Washington, D.C. (The letters stand for Dollar Collectors.)

But it’s just not funny.

There was a time when I was what you might call fiscally loose. My thinking was that I could spend the money now and put it on credit, and when I started making more money further down the road I could pay my bills off.

Then I went broke.

Now I’m a fiscal conservative: Don’t spend money you don’t have unless absolutely necessary, and in that case come up with a plan to pay it off as quickly as possible. Later this month I’m going to try to refinance my home loan as part of an effort to replace my roof; if it works out the way I plan, I’ll be able to pay off the loan earlier than I would have without financing. It’ll be hard, but not as embarrassing as knocking on the neighbor’s door to borrow buckets every time it rains.

If I worked like the Federal Government, I’d simply go to the computer in my office, print out more $20 bills, create a Department of Roof Repair, build a three room addition to the house (one to house the bureaucrats, one to store stacks of paperwork, and one for the new Congressional Weight Room), and pretend the money was actually worth something. And still not get the roof fixed.

I don’t know if my refinancing will be approved. If I can’t afford it, maybe I’ll patch the roof up the best I can, or spread a tarp over it and save up money toward doing it next year. But I can tell you what I’m not going to do:

I’m not going to print fake money that isn’t backed up by reality.

I’m not going to pretend the problem doesn’t exist.

I’m not going to keep spending at my current rate even if I don’t have as much money coming in.

I’m not going to send cash I don’t have to people in other towns who don’t like me.

I’m not going to support my neighbors if they break in and just start living in my house without asking permission.

I’m not going to go out and spend money I don’t have under the theory that it will make more money magically appear.

I’m not going to tell everyone in the house that they have to pony up more money toward the bills, without first cutting out unnecessary expenses.

I’m not going to start screaming at everyone, “It’s your fault!” in the hopes that nobody notices I’m not actually handling the problem.

I’m not going to look around, see what failed before, and keep doing it.

I’m not going to blame it on cash-eating microorganisms.

Did you notice how that list, slowly but surely, slipped from the obvious stuff, to the arguable stuff, to total nonsense? See, the problem with those clowns in Washington today is that they skipped the slipping part: They went straight down Alice’s rabbit hole, and have totally lost their grasp on reality.

A few people who’ve seen the writing on the wall (that writing would be the word “bankrupt”) have gotten to the Capital despite all efforts to maintain the status quo, but they’re far outnumbered by people who’ve been insulated inside the beltway for so long that they just don’t get it. The only thing they understand is that they have great pay and benefits, assistants to fawn over them, and no accountability because the voters just keep sending them back over and over, no matter how screwy they get.

So who’s to blame? Ultimately, the voter. Especially the voter who doesn’t actually vote. Congressmen and Presidents keep throwing green pieces of paper at whatever sacred cow the majority of their constituents agitate for, causing us to smile, think how wonderful it is that someone else is paying for our precious fill-in-the-blank, and close our minds.

Now it may be too late. This is no longer a government by and of the people, but instead a government over the people, a government of men and women who think they’re better and smarter than the unwashed masses they look down on. We were meant to have a citizen government, but instead we have a country run by bureaucrats, enabled by two buildings full of clueless front men ruling over us with the money they steal from us.

We must stop spending. Not meaningless shell games argued over by politicians protecting their pet projects, but deep, painful cuts that wash away the wasteful, uncaring paper-pushers by the rotten bushel.

If Washington can’t be taken back for the people, then maybe, as in John Carpenter’s cult movie Escape From New York, we should just wall off the entire District of Columbia and leave the remnants of our once great Capital for the rats to fight over. That should save a few bucks.

See, I told you it wouldn’t be funny. But worry not: I’m sure Congress will be establishing a Department of Humor any day now.

I'll be on vacation for a few weeks, so my internet presence will be spotty -- I have lots of chores and, hopefully, a bit of R&R along the way. We also need to spend some time planning our publicity and selling ideas for Storm Chaser, since I should be getting my print copies in a couple of weeks. Don't even talk to me about Amazon.com and other bookseller sites; with this temporary tooth crown torn up, I'm already stressed. But the tooth will be fixed tomorrow, the Kindle/Nook version will be up soon (fingers crossed!) and as usual I'm just an e-mail away. Say, I should write a column about dentists ... at least then I'd get something besides a new crown out of this.

 

SLIGHTLY OFF THE MARK

 

            I was heating up some hot dogs the other day, and got to thinking about U.S. Rep. Anthony Weiner.           

The great thing about this scandal, which ultimately takes attention away from what's really important, is that politics don't matter -- I didn't even know this guy's party until a few days after it broke. Right or left, Weiner's just ... a dick. )

 

.

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags